News

What is Darwin's theory?

Yazar Unknown Wednesday 12 April 2017 0 comments
The proponents of this theory want to tell about the formation of life and their views are spread among people. Many clear-minded people who have accepted this theory as a fact have contributed greatly to its broad spread. Moreover, because it serves its own interests, it has also been the cause of malicious intentions. This theory denies the religious teachings that describe man's creation, and thanks to him, they are trying to drag people's religionist positions into scientific methods by using scientific methods. What is the theory of this theory: According to Darwin's theory, all living creatures are primitive organisms of water. They change irrespective of the influence of environmental factors and acquire new features iris. Millions of illusions have shifted, leading to the emergence of a number of complex features that allow the collection of primitive properties acquired by the influence of the environment to be translated into more developed lifestyles of primitive organisms. This evolution continued until the formation of man. The basis of this theory 1. This theory is based on the results of archeological excavations made in Darwin's time. It is found that the remnants of primitive life forms are located on deeper floors, and the remains of more developed organisms are on upstairs. Darwin has been regulated, and many developing animals have come to fruition as the result of the evolution of early primitive animals. 2. In addition, this theory is based on the fact that early on in the development of Darwin's time, the embryos of the embryos of the animals are based on the complexity of the embryos of the animals. Such imagination was created that all living beings have general generations, and all living beings, like the embryos developed in the uterus, They have evolved. 3. In addition, this theory is based on the existence of the outbreak of blind intestines. The blind intestine helps digest the plant food in animals, but it is not a function in the human body.
The idea was created that the blind intestine, performing the functions of the ape's body, was the inexperienced rudiment (primitive organ undeveloped in the body) that remained from these animals. Evidence that this theory is a lie Archeology is a clear science, and no one ever excavated all the layers including mountains and the sea It is not. So much so that if we assume that archaeological excavations are correct, the determination of the remains of primitive life forms on the deeper floors of the earth still does not prove the formation of primitive organisms of higher organisms. It is only by this that primitive life forms existed before the higher life forms. If the excavations made at Darwin's time show that the existence of man has 600 thousand years of history, according to the modern discovery in archeology, man's existence date is about 10 million. Does this discovery still confirm that the results of archaeological investigations are volatile, that it is totally unfounded for them to arise, and that contrary to our observations in the future, is the formation of possible new discoveries? Klayd Klakxonin While announcing the book "Man in the Mirror", the physician Mustafa Şakir Selim writes that the brain of neondertal is bigger than the brain of modern man and his skull is irid. In addition, the evolution chain that paleontologists want to install is broken and there are "non-contradictory doctrines." Doctor Karim Atiyye wrote in his book "Darwin and the al-ilmi al-aqid al-folk" (Darwin's theory and the collapse of the scientific basis of the teaching of creation) : 1. The missing parts in the evolutionary chain are not only between humans and primitive life forms, but also between single-celled and multicellular organisms, between mollyusk and wheatgrass, between undeserved fish and two birds, between two birds, between reptiles and birds, between reptiles and humans. I placed them in the order of their existence in the geological periods. 2. It is a major mistake of some scholars that this theory is based on the complexity of animal embryos. For this reason, there have been no giant microscopes that allow to see the differences between the structure and development of embryos of various species. In addition, Ernst Qekkel, the German scientist who captured the drawings of the embryos, led the fraud. When Alim-embrioloqs criticized him, he confessed that he had altered the images by eight to achieve similarity between the images he obtained as not completed. 3. In the same way, the appearance of the blind intestine does not prove the similarity between man and ape.Scientific discoveries are rising day by day, but science can not explain that male males and females have males and females. If hermaphroditism is a primitive organism, gendered multiplication is characteristic for higher organisms, and if it is true that Darwin is the result of human evolution from simple organisms, then why is the hermaphroditism statement preserved in humans and has disappeared in underdeveloped animals. It is rising day by day, but science can not explain that it is not in male təkdırnaqlı animals, that men exist in male population and in male population. If hermaphroditism is a primitive organism, gendered multiplication is characteristic of higher organisms, and if it is true that Darwin is the result of human evolution from simple organisms, then why is the hermaphroditism statement preserved in humans?

No comments: